And the James Version

Oct162009

Since I’m using The Turn of the Screw by Henry James for the premise of AKMG, I thought you might like to see the original version of this scene from 1898:

The fact to be in possession of was therefore that his old friend, the youngest of several daughters of a poor country parson, had, at the age of twenty, on taking service for the first time in the schoolroom, come up to London, in trepidation, to answer in person an advertisement that had already placed her in brief correspondence with the advertiser. This person proved, on her presenting herself, for judgment, at a house in Harley Street, that impressed her as vast and imposing–this prospective patron proved a gentleman, a bachelor in the prime of life, such a figure as had never risen, save in a dream or an old novel, before a fluttered, anxious girl out of a Hampshire vicarage. One could easily fix his type; it never, happily, dies out. He was handsome and bold and pleasant, offhand and gay and kind. He struck her, inevitably, as gallant and splendid, but what took her most of all and gave her the courage she afterward showed was that he put the whole thing to her as a kind of favor, an obligation he should gratefully incur. She conceived him as rich, but as fearfully extravagant–saw him all in a glow of high fashion, of good looks, of expensive habits, of charming ways with women. He had for his own town residence a big house filled with the spoils of travel and the trophies of the chase; but it was to his country home, an old family place in Essex, that he wished her immediately to proceed.

He had been left, by the death of their parents in India, guardian to a small nephew and a small niece, children of a younger, a military brother, whom he had lost two years before. These children were, by the strangest of chances for a man in his position–a lone man without the right sort of experience or a grain of patience–very heavily on his hands. It had all been a great worry and, on his own part doubtless, a series of blunders, but he immensely pitied the poor chicks and had done all he could; had in particular sent them down to his other house, the proper place for them being of course the country, and kept them there, from the first, with the best people he could find to look after them, parting even with his own servants to wait on them and going down himself, whenever he might, to see how they were doing. The awkward thing was that they had practically no other relations and that his own affairs took up all his time. He had put them in possession of Bly, which was healthy and secure, and had placed at the head of their little establishment–but below stairs only–an excellent woman, Mrs. Grose, whom he was sure his visitor would like and who had formerly been maid to his mother. She was now housekeeper and was also acting for the time as superintendent to the little girl, of whom, without children of her own, she was, by good luck, extremely fond. There were plenty of people to help, but of course the young lady who should go down as governess would be in supreme authority. She would also have, in holidays, to look after the small boy, who had been for a term at school–young as he was to be sent, but what else could be done?–and who, as the holidays were about to begin, would be back from one day to the other. There had been for the two children at first a young lady whom they had had the misfortune to lose. She had done for them quite beautifully–she was a most respectable person–till her death, the great awkwardness of which had, precisely, left no alternative but the school for little Miles. Mrs. Grose, since then, in the way of manners and things, had done as she could for Flora; and there were, further, a cook, a housemaid, a dairywoman, an old pony, an old groom, and an old gardener, all likewise thoroughly respectable.

So far had Douglas presented his picture when someone put a question. “And what did the former governess die of?–of so much respectability?”

Our friend’s answer was prompt. “That will come out. I don’t anticipate.”

“Excuse me–I thought that was just what you are doing.”

“In her successor’s place,” I suggested, “I should have wished to learn if the office brought with it–”

“Necessary danger to life?” Douglas completed my thought. “She did wish to learn, and she did learn. You shall hear tomorrow what she learned. Meanwhile, of course, the prospect struck her as slightly grim. She was young, untried, nervous: it was a vision of serious duties and little company, of really great loneliness. She hesitated–took a couple of days to consult and consider. But the salary offered much exceeded her modest measure, and on a second interview she faced the music, she engaged.” And Douglas, with this, made a pause that, for the benefit of the company, moved me to throw in–

“The moral of which was of course the seduction exercised by the splendid young man. She succumbed to it.”

He got up and, as he had done the night before, went to the fire, gave a stir to a log with his foot, then stood a moment with his back to us. “She saw him only twice.”

“Yes, but that’s just the beauty of her passion.”

A little to my surprise, on this, Douglas turned round to me. “It was the beauty of it. There were others,” he went on, “who hadn’t succumbed. He told her frankly all his difficulty–that for several applicants the conditions had been prohibitive. They were, somehow, simply afraid. It sounded dull–it sounded strange; and all the more so because of his main condition.”

“Which was–?”

“That she should never trouble him–but never, never: neither appeal nor complain nor write about anything; only meet all questions herself, receive all moneys from his solicitor, take the whole thing over and let him alone. She promised to do this, and she mentioned to me that when, for a moment, disburdened, delighted, he held her hand, thanking her for the sacrifice, she already felt rewarded.”

“But was that all her reward?” one of the ladies asked.

“She never saw him again.”

“Oh!” said the lady; which, as our friend immediately left us again, was the only other word of importance contributed to the subject till, the next night, by the corner of the hearth, in the best chair, he opened the faded red cover of a thin old-fashioned gilt-edged album.

Filed in Writing

23 Comments to 'And the James Version'

On October 16, 2009 at 10:49 am marly said...

Tantalizing. Deliciously foreboding. I can put myself into the place of one of the listeners – if anyone suggested I miss the following night’s revelations, I would say, “Are you mad? I have to find out what happens!” But, while that first scene covers all the bases, I’m not planning on re-reading the entire thing. Ever. AKMG’s first scene leaves me wanting more, too, a lot more. It tells me all I need to know and is intriguing enough to keep me reading. What’s more important to me is that I won’t finish AKMG feeling pissed off. I vividly remember a discussion in college about TTOTS. Are they ghosts? Is she mad? – and on and on. We all left depressed. So while I can appreciate the first scenes in both works, I’ll take Crusie anytime. I’ll bet my American lit. professor (who thought James was a genius) would feel the same way. She just wouldn’t admit it.

On October 16, 2009 at 2:14 pm Bonnie C said...

“One could easily fix his type; it never, happily, dies out.”

Brilliant. I love Victorian language, but I can’t read it; too many comas and twists of thought – and this coming from a self-avowed coma junkie, mind you.

I’m *loving* this transparency on your process for AKMG. You’ve already helped me tremendously on the sixth (and last, dammit! After this is goes out come hell or high water!) incarnation of my current WIP. Thanks again!

On October 16, 2009 at 2:18 pm Marta said...

Reading things written in this vein is like eating a fabulous meal using one of those coin-operated remote control mechanical claws. The food is great, but you have to work so damn hard to get it.

On October 16, 2009 at 3:53 pm CrankyOtter said...

A word for your webmistress: I tried to print this out from MS explorer to read over lunch and the monkey and stars image in a giant blue square was in front of all the text at top and bottom of each page. While I like having the header print, it’s less useful as foreground.

On October 16, 2009 at 7:03 pm Micki said...

I sometimes get frustrated with this kind of meandering language, but there are a lot of delights to “chewing your food slowly.” The slow build-up, suddenly discharged by “and what did the former governess die of?”

(-: And now I want to read it! But I hate depressing works; is it quite unsatisfying, the ending? I read The Bostonians this year, and was OK with that. Should I take the plunge?

On October 16, 2009 at 9:36 pm Jenny said...

It’s actually very good, but it’s not an upper.
The big question with Turn of the Screw is whether there really are ghosts. James wrote it before Freud did his publishing on repression and projection, but the entire story can be read as a governess who is sexually repressed being sent into isolation in the country who slowly goes mad and thinks she sees ghosts. Or it can be read as the story of a governess who is sent into isolation in the country and finds herself in a haunted house. I swear I read a letter from James that said “Of course there are ghosts,” but I’ve never been able to find it again, so maybe not. I do think it’s an amazing story.

The big switch for me in writing AKMG is that the governess’s conflict arises in TotS because she’s so isolated. If she had somebody sane to talk to, if she could have gotten those kids out there, she’d have been okay. On the other hand, Andie would have been all right if she’d stayed isolated with the kids; instead the house becomes a clown car and every time she opens the door, somebody else comes in, and it’s all the roiling emotions and conflict that screw up her life.

If you’re looking for a good movie adaptation, the best is The Innocents. Black and white with Deborah Kerr. Screenplay by Truman Capote.

On October 17, 2009 at 1:48 am Micki said...

OK, I think I’ll do it! Can probably read it on line, even, I just realized. Now, I need something happy to “chase” it. Preferably with ghosts . . . Mary Roach’s Spook was very good (but non-fiction).

That whole era, the whole Spiritualism thing, has fascinated me since I was in elementary school. I’ve about come down on the “no ghosts” side, but I still enjoy a good ghost story.

On October 17, 2009 at 11:20 am Sheri said...

I have never read this book, but now I have to admit it sounds–tantalizing. Thinking a trip to the library is in store for me today. Or maybe I will wait a little while until the weather here finally changes. Seems more a book to be read on a dark and stormy night with a hot toddy in hand, a fire in the hearth, and a dog curled at ones feet…

On October 17, 2009 at 1:34 pm RfP said...

Hmm, this might be a good book to bring back the snow globe collection…. Eerie snow globes, that is :)
(More by Walter Martin & Paloma Muñoz)

On October 17, 2009 at 2:36 pm Jenny said...

The whole book is online at the link in the post. You can read it any time.

Another great one is The Yellow Wallpaper.

It’s a novella, so it’s all on one screen there.

On October 17, 2009 at 4:35 pm Lyn said...

It’s a famous book, and it’s going to get the Crusie touch, so it will probably be good.
But, um, that excerpt–no. Honestly, I can’t think of anything worse than being shut up in a country house with two strange (unfamiliar) children and no hunk in sight. Yes. I can. It’s having to read a book about it.
I am soooo glad to hear your description of the house as a clown car–now that sounds delish! That I would like. Lots.
The Yellow Wallpaper is a good read, AIR.
Now that you’ve said clown car I’m totally on board for this.

On October 17, 2009 at 6:53 pm Lyn said...

Wow, my shrimp chow mein is getting cold, but I finally figured out what has pissed me off so much about this story. I read it a hundred years ago, when I was reading all the other ghost stories and the Brontes and buying into the received wisdom of what was good.

But look here: a good-looking, selfish, smooth-talking tricky dude “seduces” an innocent young woman into heading off to an isolated spookhouse to take care of two kids with no input from anyone–certainly not from him because he just can’t be bothered. He’s busy with his job, after all. So she goes there and the kids drive her nuts or maybe there are ghosts, and mean ones. And I don’t remember how it comes out and I don’t have the time or interest to read the original, which is such a piss-off.

But look at that girl’s situation and how she got into it. Tell me–ISN’T THIS THE VERY THING THAT GOT BETTY FRIEDAN SO UPSET?

And I never should have said your book would be okay. It’ll be great, because you will overturn the gawdoffal situation of the original. And yes, I recall somewhere that James said the ghosts were real. But that doesn’t change the absolute selfishness of the man and the lack of–something–self preservation instinct? of the woman.

Okay. Off the soapbox and toward the microwave.

On October 17, 2009 at 9:45 pm Jenny said...

Yeah, that’s the reason I first wanted to rewrite it, so the governess could get on the phone and say, “There are ghosts, get your selfish ass down here.” But of course, if she’d done that, it wouldn’t be Turn of the Screw.

On October 18, 2009 at 11:22 pm Micki said...

LOL, I felt very similar sentiments upon finishing The Count of Monte Cristo. Great adventure, craptastic ending. I want to set it in the far future, give the hero a sex-change, and end it Happily.

As for Turn . . . my first thought upon finishing (about 15 minutes ago) was, what the hell happened here? And that poor man . . . I can’t imagine how James went around with that, that, that *thing* in his head, getting it down on paper.

Still very confused. Was she just temporarily insane? Because the guy telling the Christmas ghost story seemed to think she was a pretty nice lady. And those kids . . . lost their folks, abused by Quint and Jessel . . . the nice kid act was protective coloring — I’ll be good, God, I promise — and to still be accused of trickery and evil tendencies by the mad governess . . . .

Ah well, joys of literature. Also, I’ve got a Halloween reader, and find it so curious that *Christmas* was so associated with Ghost Stories. Look at A Christmas Carol first, and then I’m sure there are a ton of others. Kind of makes sense — you need death before a re-birth — but so at odds with our modern conception of Christmas.

(-: rambling, sorry. I’m glad I read it, but not sure I’m up to reading it again so I can really understand it . . . .

On October 18, 2009 at 11:49 pm Jenny said...

You’re not alone, Micki. Volumes have been written on that sucker. I’m pretty sure James said the ghosts were real, but I’m also pretty sure the governess had gone round the bend at the end. Look on the bright side, “dispossessed” meant Miles was free of both Quint and the governess. It’s a win-win. Well, and a lose, but still.

The guy telling the Christmas story had been in love with her so he’s the classic Unreliable Narrator. Plus, she’s an unreliable narrator because she’s obviously justifying everything that happened, which is normal and human and in this case creepy.

Now imagine the story if Miles or Flora were telling it.

On October 19, 2009 at 7:03 am Micki said...

Read a couple of essays, and have things pretty well straight in my head now. Yeah, Douglas (? I mean Unreliable Narrator) was also quite enthusiastic about the young man who hired the governess, too, even though in the narrative he is such a cold bastard. So I can see where he might think a charming sociopath would be . . . charming. I wonder why she sent the manuscript to Unreliable anyway? An echo of Miles, who went out to the lawn just to show he could be bad?

Miles or Flora . . . poor babies. I really don’t want to hear their POV. Too harrowing.

(-: OK, I’m going to leave it be for awhile. This is definitely a book that would benefit from a Henry James internet fan club. Reading it alone is not the way it was meant to be read, I think.

On October 18, 2009 at 7:35 pm Lori J. said...

There’s a 1989 British PBS version of The Yellow Wallpaper done years ago. Super creepy.

On October 19, 2009 at 9:47 pm Micki said...

Just read The Yellow Wallpaper . . . whoa. There’s a link there where the author explains how she came to write that, and that is quite heartening. Brrrr. I can see why “they” invented ghosts — it’s much easier to examine that kind of problem from a distance . . . . Probably not as effective, though . . . .

On October 19, 2009 at 10:36 pm sharon said...

The works of Henry James and Edith Wharton are the books that drove me to romance novels! Winter is very depressing for me and I always made a long list of things to do to keep my mind and hands occupied during the long, dark days. We live out in the country so I would make lists of serious, important authors to read and get these books fro m the library in big sacks. Last winter I became even MORE depressed and decided that I could NOT read any more fiction about a character who was in worse mental shape than I. That’s when I discovered Jenny and I just lost myself in happiness. The cold, snow, ice and bad roads disappeared and I could spend the day worried about how to get and keep that man. The men are strong, goodlooking and the women are real-who could ask for more! Of course, I don’t just read Jenny-I have tried other romance writers. As we all know, there is a huge amount of romance literature out there so I can pick and choose. Some books I read are “keepers” to be read again and others are passed to friends. I will be happy to never read another regency romance in my lifetime nor do I care for westerns but as long as Jenny keeps writing I will be happy!

On October 19, 2009 at 11:44 pm Sharon Bates said...

My comment must have gone into space-anyone find it?

On October 20, 2009 at 12:46 am Jenny said...

It ended up in moderation, Sharon. Did you use a different e-mail address or log-in? First time posters are the ones who get moderated. Anyway, it’s up now.

On October 20, 2009 at 7:54 am DownUnderGal said...

Okay, sorry to be the heathen in the group but the first sentence bored me to tears. As did the second. I didn’t read any further. I dont care if Henry James wrote it and I get its supposed to be “good” and real “literature but if I’d paid money for this I would have thrown it against the wall.
Give me this opener any day:
Once upon a time, Minerva Dobbs thought as she stood in the middle of a loud yuppie bar, the world was full of good men. She looked into the handsome face of the man she’d planned on as a date to her sister’s wedding and thought, Those days are gone.

On October 20, 2009 at 8:35 am ineed3 said...

Yeah, I have to say I had a little trouble getting into the world of the story when I read TOTS, but once I did I devoured every page. When I finally got to the last page, it was like, “WHAT!? No, that can’t be IT!” and kept turning pages, looking for more story because it couldn’t possibly END THAT WAY! The last page made me want to throw it against the wall, but up until then it was gripping. Also: OF COURSE there were ghosts. Only old men have the fantasy that sexually repressing a girl for years and years and years and years (until she reaches the ancient age of, say, 19 or 20 the way this girl probably was) would send her round the bend. Speaking from the perspective of someone who had plenty of celebrity crushes but didn’t actually date a guy until she was 18, I can tell you I did not hallucinate- at least, not to my knowledge! :) Thanks for rewriting this one, Jenny- I can’t wait to see it turn out good!

Share Your Comment