<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call For Papers: Nothing But Good Times Ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/</link>
	<description>More than you ever wanted to hear from Jenny Crusie.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G and T</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24332</link>
		<dc:creator>G and T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24332</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t get why Lucy was mad at Wilder, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get why Lucy was mad at Wilder, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evesie</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24319</link>
		<dc:creator>evesie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24319</guid>
		<description>Diane and Rfp

thanks very much for your help. &lt;i&gt;THANKS&lt;/i&gt; :-D

Rfp - omg the indexed site is so cute :) thanks, im cheery now. any more good stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane and Rfp</p>
<p>thanks very much for your help. <i>THANKS</i> <img src='http://www.arghink.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Rfp &#8211; omg the indexed site is so cute <img src='http://www.arghink.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  thanks, im cheery now. any more good stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RfP</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24302</link>
		<dc:creator>RfP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24302</guid>
		<description>Thank you, evesie.  I don&#039;t want to hijack the Crusie-o-rama for a me-me-megasm, so feel free to come comment on RfP if you want to chat about my reviews.

Here&#039;s how to format all purty-like:

Bold--  &lt;b&gt;&lt;b&gt;text&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Italics-- &lt;i&gt;&lt;i&gt;text&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;it’s winter. It’s depressing. And we want funnies!!&lt;/i&gt;
I&#039;m not funny like Jenny, but if you&#039;re visual, &lt;a href=&quot;http://indexed.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s some nerdy-wry humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, evesie.  I don&#8217;t want to hijack the Crusie-o-rama for a me-me-megasm, so feel free to come comment on RfP if you want to chat about my reviews.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how to format all purty-like:</p>
<p>Bold&#8211;  &lt;b&gt;<b>text</b>&lt;/b&gt;<br />
Italics&#8211; &lt;i&gt;<i>text</i>&lt;/i&gt;</p>
<p><i>it’s winter. It’s depressing. And we want funnies!!</i><br />
I&#8217;m not funny like Jenny, but if you&#8217;re visual, <a href="http://indexed.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">here</a>&#8217;s some nerdy-wry humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane (TT)</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24294</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane (TT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24294</guid>
		<description>Evesie:  I already ate my lunch (an hour and a half early), so I will try to show italics.

HTML commands always begin and end with .   To begin, you put the letter of the command (b for bold, i for italics) in the brackets.  so:  &lt;i&gt; (but without the spaces).  

To end (that is, when you want to resume regular text), &lt;/i&gt; (again, without the spaces).

If I don&#039;t put the spaces in, it&#039;ll just DO it, it won&#039;t show the command.

I hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evesie:  I already ate my lunch (an hour and a half early), so I will try to show italics.</p>
<p>HTML commands always begin and end with .   To begin, you put the letter of the command (b for bold, i for italics) in the brackets.  so:  <i> (but without the spaces).  </p>
<p>To end (that is, when you want to resume regular text), </i> (again, without the spaces).</p>
<p>If I don&#8217;t put the spaces in, it&#8217;ll just DO it, it won&#8217;t show the command.</p>
<p>I hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evesie</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24286</link>
		<dc:creator>evesie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24286</guid>
		<description>RFP

I&#039;m not sure how you guys divide things up, but aside from liking the blog generally (I totally got the Time Magazine issue), there are particular entries I like.

In an entry dated Sept. 20, 2007, I really loved this quote, &quot;I wasn&#039;t impressed by the one Lucy Monroe novel I tried, but I am impressed that she&#039;s apparently managed to write about something horrendously intimate in a matter-of-fact way, and get it published widely. (See Monroe&#039;s website for an interesting contrast between the banal fairytale described by the book&#039;s cover copy and the public health statement farther down the page.) She has also written about endometriosis and about impotence in a wheelchair-bound man.&quot;

Honest. Poignant. Witty. Good stuff. 

Also, I can appreciate the fact that while you didn&#039;t like the book, you found some positives. Considering I&#039;m reading &quot;Me Times Three&quot; right now and am not impressed (no matter if Sarah Jessica Parker endorsed it), I am struggling to get through it but am looking for interesting tid-bits along the way. 

Lastly, how do you guys make things italicized? And why is there no new entry in such a long time? Ms. Crusie: it&#039;s winter. It&#039;s depressing. And we want funnies!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RFP</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how you guys divide things up, but aside from liking the blog generally (I totally got the Time Magazine issue), there are particular entries I like.</p>
<p>In an entry dated Sept. 20, 2007, I really loved this quote, &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t impressed by the one Lucy Monroe novel I tried, but I am impressed that she&#8217;s apparently managed to write about something horrendously intimate in a matter-of-fact way, and get it published widely. (See Monroe&#8217;s website for an interesting contrast between the banal fairytale described by the book&#8217;s cover copy and the public health statement farther down the page.) She has also written about endometriosis and about impotence in a wheelchair-bound man.&#8221;</p>
<p>Honest. Poignant. Witty. Good stuff. </p>
<p>Also, I can appreciate the fact that while you didn&#8217;t like the book, you found some positives. Considering I&#8217;m reading &#8220;Me Times Three&#8221; right now and am not impressed (no matter if Sarah Jessica Parker endorsed it), I am struggling to get through it but am looking for interesting tid-bits along the way. </p>
<p>Lastly, how do you guys make things italicized? And why is there no new entry in such a long time? Ms. Crusie: it&#8217;s winter. It&#8217;s depressing. And we want funnies!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Vivanco</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24246</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Vivanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24246</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I know you’re not into shoes, but underwear is like a gateway drug. First, symbolic underpants. Next, socks that say Left and Right. Then shoes that scream Toes In Bondage. And then… you need more closet space.&lt;/i&gt;

The closet space problem is one Jenny will have to deal with. Although I have the impression she&#039;s solved it by turning her socks into strange puppet creatures and letting the dogs chew some of the shoes.

Fictional underwear and shoes, however, just mean that I need more shelf-space for books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I know you’re not into shoes, but underwear is like a gateway drug. First, symbolic underpants. Next, socks that say Left and Right. Then shoes that scream Toes In Bondage. And then… you need more closet space.</i></p>
<p>The closet space problem is one Jenny will have to deal with. Although I have the impression she&#8217;s solved it by turning her socks into strange puppet creatures and letting the dogs chew some of the shoes.</p>
<p>Fictional underwear and shoes, however, just mean that I need more shelf-space for books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RfP</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24235</link>
		<dc:creator>RfP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24235</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The focus of my paper is on the deeper meanings of underwear in Jenny’s novels. Jenny has some very symbolic underpants&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Laura, I know you&#039;re not into shoes, but underwear is like a gateway drug.  First, symbolic underpants.   Next, socks that say Left and Right.  Then shoes that scream Toes In Bondage.  And then... you need more closet space.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;read for pleasure is a marvelous blog! thanks&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s &lt;i&gt;got&lt;/i&gt; to be about something of mine, right?  &lt;strike&gt;Don&#039;t disillusion me.&lt;/strike&gt;  Thank you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The focus of my paper is on the deeper meanings of underwear in Jenny’s novels. Jenny has some very symbolic underpants&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Laura, I know you&#8217;re not into shoes, but underwear is like a gateway drug.  First, symbolic underpants.   Next, socks that say Left and Right.  Then shoes that scream Toes In Bondage.  And then&#8230; you need more closet space.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;read for pleasure is a marvelous blog! thanks&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s <i>got</i> to be about something of mine, right?  <strike>Don&#8217;t disillusion me.</strike>  Thank you <img src='http://www.arghink.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24072</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24072</guid>
		<description>RE: The focus of my paper is on the deeper meanings of underwear in Jenny’s novels. Jenny has some very symbolic underpants.


Hmmm.  Now I have to go back and re-read all of her books, looking for underwear. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: The focus of my paper is on the deeper meanings of underwear in Jenny’s novels. Jenny has some very symbolic underpants.</p>
<p>Hmmm.  Now I have to go back and re-read all of her books, looking for underwear. LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24064</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-24064</guid>
		<description>Well, my essay is titled:  We&#039;re Doomed.

Not that I&#039;m a pessimist or anything.

I&#039;ve read a couple of Crusie books, namely Don&#039;t Look Down and Agnes and the Hitman.  Not bad.  But a little bloody.  

And I still don&#039;t understand why Lucy was angry with Wilder.  But I&#039;m just a guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my essay is titled:  We&#8217;re Doomed.</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m a pessimist or anything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read a couple of Crusie books, namely Don&#8217;t Look Down and Agnes and the Hitman.  Not bad.  But a little bloody.  </p>
<p>And I still don&#8217;t understand why Lucy was angry with Wilder.  But I&#8217;m just a guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane L.</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23946</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23946</guid>
		<description>Simply awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talpianna</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23901</link>
		<dc:creator>talpianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23901</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very good book (with at least one R-rated illustration inside) and it was made into a very entertaining HBO movie starring James Garner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very good book (with at least one R-rated illustration inside) and it was made into a very entertaining HBO movie starring James Garner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23900</guid>
		<description>&quot;But generally speaking, romance readers don’t buy new authors in hard cover&quot;

True. But then they bitch when that author goes from pb/trade size to HC. 
Just saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But generally speaking, romance readers don’t buy new authors in hard cover&#8221;</p>
<p>True. But then they bitch when that author goes from pb/trade size to HC.<br />
Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office Wench Cherry</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23896</link>
		<dc:creator>Office Wench Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23896</guid>
		<description>Yes!  That&#039;s it.  Barbarians, dragons, I knew there was something big and mean at the gate and it sounded like it belonged in a fantasy novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!  That&#8217;s it.  Barbarians, dragons, I knew there was something big and mean at the gate and it sounded like it belonged in a fantasy novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talpianna</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23893</link>
		<dc:creator>talpianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23893</guid>
		<description>Cherry, I once found a copy of &lt;b&gt;Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Sex but Were Afraid to Ask&lt;/b&gt; shelved under Science Fiction.

And I think this is the book you are referring to:
http://www.kingstone.com.tw/english/images/Product/006/0060536357.jpg

Certainly not MY idea of a fantasy cover!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cherry, I once found a copy of <b>Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Sex but Were Afraid to Ask</b> shelved under Science Fiction.</p>
<p>And I think this is the book you are referring to:<br />
<a href="http://www.kingstone.com.tw/english/images/Product/006/0060536357.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.kingstone.com.tw/english/images/Product/006/0060536357.jpg</a></p>
<p>Certainly not MY idea of a fantasy cover!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23875</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Diane, when it&#039;s things you can&#039;t wait for.  But generally speaking, romance readers don&#039;t buy new authors in hard cover.  And since when SMP published me, nobody knew who I was, they went with General Fiction.

And I love the Prius.  Great car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Diane, when it&#8217;s things you can&#8217;t wait for.  But generally speaking, romance readers don&#8217;t buy new authors in hard cover.  And since when SMP published me, nobody knew who I was, they went with General Fiction.</p>
<p>And I love the Prius.  Great car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane (TT)</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23871</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane (TT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23871</guid>
		<description>Sorry about being wrong about the numbers.  It must have been D&amp;G that gets fewer regular visitors.  5000 per month is awesome!  I&#039;m glad to know that excellence is appreciated!

I may have to buy a new car.  In fact, I probably will (I&#039;m really bummed about this - I loved my old car, it was very good to me).  So, Jenny (I&#039;m not trying to hijack, and go ahead and boot this, if you like) - do you love your Prius, does it have drawbacks (especially snow-related? 

I&#039;ve been driving an Accord for 13 years, and the Prius is definitely smaller, but how often do I need all that space (except to keep me from being killed when people and deer run into me)?  Mostly I just drive (in traffic) 10+ miles to work every day, so the hybrid would really help with the mileage there. 

And romance readers do TOO buy in hard cover!  When it&#039;s things we can&#039;t wait for, and know we will read over and over... Not that I&#039;m arguing with your stats, I just know about myself and a bunch of other crazy CBs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about being wrong about the numbers.  It must have been D&amp;G that gets fewer regular visitors.  5000 per month is awesome!  I&#8217;m glad to know that excellence is appreciated!</p>
<p>I may have to buy a new car.  In fact, I probably will (I&#8217;m really bummed about this &#8211; I loved my old car, it was very good to me).  So, Jenny (I&#8217;m not trying to hijack, and go ahead and boot this, if you like) &#8211; do you love your Prius, does it have drawbacks (especially snow-related? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been driving an Accord for 13 years, and the Prius is definitely smaller, but how often do I need all that space (except to keep me from being killed when people and deer run into me)?  Mostly I just drive (in traffic) 10+ miles to work every day, so the hybrid would really help with the mileage there. </p>
<p>And romance readers do TOO buy in hard cover!  When it&#8217;s things we can&#8217;t wait for, and know we will read over and over&#8230; Not that I&#8217;m arguing with your stats, I just know about myself and a bunch of other crazy CBs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McB</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23859</link>
		<dc:creator>McB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23859</guid>
		<description>I like to think that Jenny&#039;s books, and a few other romance genre authors, show up in &#039;literature&#039; so often because the appeal goes beyond romance genre readers.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a coincidence that so many Crusie fans are wide read with eclectic reading habits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to think that Jenny&#8217;s books, and a few other romance genre authors, show up in &#8216;literature&#8217; so often because the appeal goes beyond romance genre readers.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a coincidence that so many Crusie fans are wide read with eclectic reading habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office Wench Cherry</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23858</link>
		<dc:creator>Office Wench Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23858</guid>
		<description>Jenny said: In bookstores, it’s about marketing, not content.

Sometimes in small stores with crappy staff it&#039;s about key words in the title.  When I was in my early 20s I worked at a small, independant store that was bought (upon the retirement of the owner) by a large chain who intended to close our store (even though we netted a 2+ million profit every year).  They opened one of their stores at the other end of the mall and staffed it with people who only knew a book from a hole in the ground because the books were on shelves. Two of them were friends with my co-worker and very nice people.  Just not book people.  At that time there was a book out with a title something like &quot;Dragons at the Gate: the rise and fall of Some Company or Other&quot;  The cover had a photo of the company logo.  

They shelved it in fantasy.

Seeing as how this chain was paying my rent and I&#039;m anal about these sorts of things I moved all the copies to business.  

Two days later it was back in fantasy.

Then again, this is the same store that had one staff member who, when approached by a customer looking for books on Mount Everest said &quot;Mount Everest?  Is that in the Rockies?&quot;

She left, came to my store and we sold her three books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenny said: In bookstores, it’s about marketing, not content.</p>
<p>Sometimes in small stores with crappy staff it&#8217;s about key words in the title.  When I was in my early 20s I worked at a small, independant store that was bought (upon the retirement of the owner) by a large chain who intended to close our store (even though we netted a 2+ million profit every year).  They opened one of their stores at the other end of the mall and staffed it with people who only knew a book from a hole in the ground because the books were on shelves. Two of them were friends with my co-worker and very nice people.  Just not book people.  At that time there was a book out with a title something like &#8220;Dragons at the Gate: the rise and fall of Some Company or Other&#8221;  The cover had a photo of the company logo.  </p>
<p>They shelved it in fantasy.</p>
<p>Seeing as how this chain was paying my rent and I&#8217;m anal about these sorts of things I moved all the copies to business.  </p>
<p>Two days later it was back in fantasy.</p>
<p>Then again, this is the same store that had one staff member who, when approached by a customer looking for books on Mount Everest said &#8220;Mount Everest?  Is that in the Rockies?&#8221;</p>
<p>She left, came to my store and we sold her three books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23855</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23855</guid>
		<description>Argh gets about 5000 unique visitors a month.  I know, it boggles my mind, too.  It&#039;s not like we have a plan here.  

I think the genre thing depends on who&#039;s doing the labeling.  Publishers label books to get them to the audience who will buy them and bookstores shelve the books by those labels because otherwise, they&#039;ll never find them during inventory.  (I used to work in a bookstore.  Every time somebody picked up a book, wandered off with it, and put it down someplace else, our inventory went to hell again.)  So Harlequins are always shelved in romance because they&#039;re definitely romances.   But my STs are shelved in General Fiction because they come out in hardcover, and romance readers in general don&#039;t buy hardcovers because they wait for the paperback, and hardcover buyers generally don&#039;t buy romance, so . . .
In bookstores, it&#039;s about marketing, not content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh gets about 5000 unique visitors a month.  I know, it boggles my mind, too.  It&#8217;s not like we have a plan here.  </p>
<p>I think the genre thing depends on who&#8217;s doing the labeling.  Publishers label books to get them to the audience who will buy them and bookstores shelve the books by those labels because otherwise, they&#8217;ll never find them during inventory.  (I used to work in a bookstore.  Every time somebody picked up a book, wandered off with it, and put it down someplace else, our inventory went to hell again.)  So Harlequins are always shelved in romance because they&#8217;re definitely romances.   But my STs are shelved in General Fiction because they come out in hardcover, and romance readers in general don&#8217;t buy hardcovers because they wait for the paperback, and hardcover buyers generally don&#8217;t buy romance, so . . .<br />
In bookstores, it&#8217;s about marketing, not content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane (TT)</title>
		<link>http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23844</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane (TT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arghink.com/2008/01/31/call-for-papers-nothing-but-good-times-ahead/#comment-23844</guid>
		<description>I think Jenny said (sorry, not going to look it up; clearly I have no future in academia) that there are only a few hundred readers to this blog - but that may well double purchases of an academic publication.  

Some of us are, primarily, library readers perhaps (I do keep TRYING), but I suspect that enough of us are SERIOUS FANS WITH NO SELF-CONTROL that, given notice of publication - we&#039;ll buy the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jenny said (sorry, not going to look it up; clearly I have no future in academia) that there are only a few hundred readers to this blog &#8211; but that may well double purchases of an academic publication.  </p>
<p>Some of us are, primarily, library readers perhaps (I do keep TRYING), but I suspect that enough of us are SERIOUS FANS WITH NO SELF-CONTROL that, given notice of publication &#8211; we&#8217;ll buy the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
